« Half of schoolchildren bullied (if bullying defined as rudeness) | Main | The Reader »

Thursday, January 08, 2009

Using your money to exclude you

Public money used to stop public having a greater say in policing - Telegraph.

Don't ask whose money it is. Our public officials certainly don't think it's ours. Listening to "The World at One" as I drove along the M56 today, I heard Yvette Cooper, Labour's current irritant-in chief, talk about "an injection of government money into the economy." Where did she think that "government money" came from? And if it was not in the economy before, where was it, why and can we have a tour of those caves please?

To the extent the government has cash in its coffers, it belongs to that minority of people from whom it was extracted by force. If Cooper was thinking of money the government plans to print quantitatively ease, then that's a dilution of the value of the money not yet taken by force. And if she meant money the government plans to borrow in our name, it's our grandchildrens' money, as yet unearned. Whichever it is, it's not government money. The government is merely supposed to supervise its prudent application to public purposes on our behalf.

If the obnoxious Ms Cooper knew whose money it was, she would not cause offence every time she carries the bucket behind Alistair Darling's horse (while he carries the bucket behind Gordon Brown's) - to use Paxo's charming (and, of course, entirely unbiased) imagery when speaking of George Osborne and David Cameron the other evening.

As for campaigning with public money to have the public excluded from decision-making, it's a wonderful little metaphor for life under Labour. The British state now has a  beastly life all of its own and we are merely parasites in its fur. Why do Police Authorities even need an association, anyway? What benefit has the public ever derived from this particular use of its funds? If a public movement grew up to demand that the association be disbanded, would the APA listen to the public's concerns or just use our money to oppose that too? I suspect it would do the latter and with no more of a qualm than a sense of irony.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451f09b69e2010536bd9d89970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Using your money to exclude you:

Comments

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

Welcome


  • Join LPUK link

Follow Me

Get updates on my activity. Follow me on my Profile.

Powered by Rollyo

Blogpower

  • Defending the Blog / Manifesto
    Blogpower
  • Blogpower Blogroll
  • Blogpower RSS Feeds
    Blogpower

Tom recommends

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Other sites I like

    BlogCatalog

    Technorati

    Quotes

    • Edward R. Murrow
      A nation of sheep soon begets a government of wolves
    • George Orwell
      If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear
    • Voltaire
      Un despote a toujours quelques bons moments ; une assemblée de despotes n’en a jamais. Si un tyran me fait une injustice, je peux le désarmer par sa maîtresse, par son confesseur, ou par son page ; mais une compagnie de graves tyrans est inaccessible à toutes les séductions.
    • CS Lewis
      Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies, The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
    • Thomas Paine
      I have always strenuously supported the Right of every Man to his own opinion, however different that opinion might be to mine. He who denies to another this right, makes a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes himself the right of changing it.
    • Thomas Sowell
      Many have argued that capitalism does not offer a satisfactory moral message. But that is like saying that calculus does not contain carbohydrates, amino acids, or other essential nutrients. Everything fails by irrelevant standards
    • Richard Lindzen (climate scientist, MIT)
      Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat's dream. If you control carbon, you control life.
    • Frederic Bastiat
      And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty.
    • AA Gill
      But don’t for a moment imagine that the bicycle-riding, organic-hedgerow-grazing, self-denying, 40-watt miserablists are in fact selfless crusaders for the common good. Never underestimate the sustaining pleasure in a hair shirt. Just look at George Monbiot, and witness a man who couldn’t be happier about the imminent demise of life as we know it. It’s given him purpose, prestige and celebrity: without global warming he’d be a geography teacher.
    • John W. Gardner
      The society which scorns excellence in plumbing because plumbing is a humble activity, and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because philosophy is an exalted activity, will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy. Neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water.

    The Truth Laid Bear


    Statistics

    • Twitter


    • View My Stats

    Blog powered by TypePad
    Member since 09/2006