THE LAST DITCH An Englishman returned after twenty years abroad blogs about liberty in Britain
"From programming bits, to programming atoms..."
The face of British Authority

Gadding about

Link: The Devil's Kitchen: Gadding about.

I said I felt obliged to write about the current paedophilia witch-hunt. I am positively quivering with rage at the way in which our detestable Home Secretary is playing on the prejudices of the unwashed and ignorant in the case of Paul Gadd, aka Gary Glitter.

No-one approves of paedophilia, but the way in which emotion has been allowed to override the principles of justice is more dangerous by far than the nastiest paedophile alive. In the past 48 hours, I have been horrified by some of the stuff I have read on blogs on this subject, including serving police officers expressing - apparently in all seriousness - the view that only bullets in a paedophile's head will keep our children safe.

Every time I say it, I attract readers' wrath, but here I go again. A paedophile can no more choose his sexual urges than can any other deviant from the sexual norm. He is worthy of compassion for precisely as long as he restrains himself from putting those urges into practice. As his objects of desire can never consent, his sexuality can never find consensual expression and so he is condemned to chastity. It is insane, given the pressures under which that puts him, that our society has proscribed even digital aids to the masturbatory fantasies which any rational person would wish him to find as satisfying as possible.

But say I am wrong. Say he has a choice. In that case, he is a criminal like any other. These and many other points, I was planning to make at length, but DK has already done it  and done it well. I endorse every word of his post, and would only add this. The present witch-hunt is a disgrace to a once-civilised nation. I hope Paul Gadd can restrain his horrible urges in future. I also hope he can find a country which will either treat him for his mental illness (if that is what it is) or leave him free to try to avoid re-offending.

Jacqui Smith is either an ignoramus or pretends to be one in order to win the votes of those who are. Either way, she is a traitor to every civilised value this country ever stood for and unfit to be Home Secretary. I despise her political exploitation of this pathetic man with every fibre of my being.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Ah, so we need to legalize child porn and the pederast would simply wank himself to death in the privacy of his own home?

There is no argument that is at all acceptable in any civilized society for child abuse - depicted anyhow you choose - is acceptable. I can only assume that anyone (aside from a pedant) who has children would want child abusers fueled in their deviant desires.

Pederasts are scum. They take what they cannot restore, or offer any real restitution for. Give 'em the rope. Illiberal I know, but I have children, and I see the innocence in small children, and believe that innocence is special; once lost it can never return.

pedophile apologists give libertarianism and liberty a bad name.

Mr Eugenides

I don't think anyone's arguing that we should piss on him to put the fire out; but that doesn't justify lighting the fire in the first place.

We expect this sort of rubbish from the tabloid press, but for the Home Secretary to be jumping on the bandwagon is little short of disgusting.

tired and emotional

The best masturbatory aid has always been the mind. Gadd is free to indulge whatever ghastly fantasy he chooses within the confines of his own synapses. I can't see anyone putting forward any decent arguments as to why we should help him with this. Personally I wouldn't piss on Shitter if he was on fire. Won't apologise for that. Time served or no time served. Sorry.

The comments to this entry are closed.